Identifying the subtle and insidious signs of coercive control is challenging but can be vital for the well-being of individuals and families. It is important to be able to spot the signs of coercive control as early as possible.
This form of abuse, often hidden beneath the surface, can have profound and lasting effects on those subjected to it. As leading family law experts, we want to shed light on this all-too-pervasive issue.
In this article, we delve into what can constitute coercive control, the signs to look out for, and the legal avenues available in Australia to safeguard yourself and your loved ones. By raising awareness and understanding, we hope to empower individuals, equip them with knowledge, and ultimately, contribute to breaking the cycle of this silent form of domestic violence.
Coercive control is an ongoing and deliberate pattern of behaviour intended to dominate, control, or isolate another person through repeated harmful actions, which can be physical or non-physical. These actions, while sometimes appearing minor individually, become significantly harmful through repetition and continuity. Coercive control can occur in various relationships, including intimate partnerships, family dynamics, or caregiving situations. It’s particularly recognised as domestic abuse and is a criminal offence in many Australian states, including Queensland. The controlling behaviours are often tailored specifically to the individual victim, shifting as circumstances change. Help is available for anyone experiencing or concerned about coercive control.
Here are a few of the key signs of coercive control. It’s important to note that not all of the following signs need to be present in order for abuse to qualify as coercive control; any single one of these signs on its own qualifies as coercive control. And there may be other forms that are not included below. As such, this list is not exhaustive. If you notice any of the following signs in your relationship or the relationship of a family member or friend, seek help today.
The abuser may seek to cut off the victim from their social networks, often under the guise of love or concern. This isolation can lead to the victim feeling alone and dependent on their abuser for social interaction and support.
This could involve strict rules about mundane aspects of daily life, such as what to wear, what to eat, or where to go. This kind of micromanagement can significantly restrict the victim’s personal freedom and decision-making power.
The abuser may monitor the victim’s communications, snoop on their personal devices or track their physical movements, undermining their personal privacy and autonomy.
This could involve withholding access to necessary resources like money, food, transportation, or medical care, increasing the victim’s reliance on the abuser, significantly impacting their independence and well-being.
The abuser may use threats, whether direct or indirect, to induce fear and compliance. This could involve threats of physical harm, threats to harm loved ones, or threats of self-harm. These threats may range from subtle hints to overt statements of harm.
This psychological manipulation tactic is used to make victims question their own reality or sanity. The abuser may deny events, twist the truth, or belittle the victim’s feelings and experiences, leading them to doubt their own perceptions and judgement.
The victim may be subjected to constant criticism, humiliation, or insults, eroding their self-esteem and sense of self-worth.
This could involve the abuser refusing to let the victim leave the house, controlling where they can go, or even physically restraining them.
The abuser may control the victim’s access to financial resources, monitor their spending, or make all financial decisions, rendering the victim financially dependent.
The abuser might lie, withhold important information, or distort the truth to confuse and control the victim.
The abuser may insist on the victim adhering to seemingly insignificant demands or routines, instilling a constant state of compliance and fear of consequences.
If the victim doesn’t comply with the abuser’s rules or demands, they may face punishments. These could range from emotional manipulation to physical harm, or threats towards someone or something close to the victim.
The abuser might dictate how the victim should look, including their clothing, hairstyle, makeup, or weight.
Each of these signs individually can be harmful, but when combined in a pattern of coercive control, they can have a deeply damaging and lasting impact on the victim’s emotional, psychological, and physical wellbeing. It’s crucial to recognise these signs and take action, whether you’re a victim or a concerned friend or family member.
If you find yourself subjected to a situation of coercive control, it’s crucial to remember that you’re not alone and there are resources available to support you. Here are a few ways that you can deal with it:
Remember, it’s important to take steps that are safe for your situation. Each circumstance is unique, and what works for one person might not work for another. You don’t have to face this alone, and help is available.
Separation can cause many challenges for parents and children alike, including stress and uncertainty around the children’s care arrangements. It is important to understand your options.
There are two main ways to formalise parenting arrangements, firstly, through a parenting plan and, secondly, through Consent Orders. Both come with their own advantages and disadvantages. So, which option is best for you and your family?
A parenting plan sets out the parenting arrangements for a child or multiple children.
Parenting plans are typically entered into jointly by the parents when they agree on the care arrangements for a child.
The Family Law Act 1975 (the Act) governs parenting plans and the requirements for a document to be recognised as a parenting plan.
Under the Act, a parenting plan is an agreement that:
A parenting plan must be made free from any threat, duress or coercion.
Some of the benefits of a parenting plan include:
Some of the disadvantages of a parenting plan include:
Consent Orders for parenting are Court Orders that formalise the agreement reached between parties about the care arrangements for a child or multiple children. Consent Orders for parenting are also governed under the Act.
To enter into Consent Orders, you and the other party (usually the other parent) complete and file specific documents with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (the Court).
One document you file is an Application for Consent Orders, providing the Court with information about, including, but not limited to, the child, parents, and the current and proposed care arrangements.
This provides the Court with information to assist in determining if the Orders are in the child’s best interest, which is the paramount consideration of the Court.
You and the other party also complete and file a Minutes of Consent, setting out the agreement that you have reached, along with other accompanying documents. The Minutes of Consent may cover similar things as a parenting plan and may be written in a similar, but more formal manner.
They are the terms of the orders that the parties are seeking to be made by the Court. Once Consent Orders are made by the Court, they are binding and enforceable on the parties.
Some advantages of Consent Orders include:
There are many advantages and disadvantages to parenting plans and Consent Orders.
There may be more flexibility to vary a parenting plan if the needs of the child or parents’ change and it may cost less to enter into a parenting plan, when compared to Consent Orders.
Consent Orders are legally binding and enforceable on the parties, arguably providing greater certainty on the arrangements for the child.
They also provide for more access to remedies if a party does not comply with the Orders.
It can be difficult deciding if a parenting plan or Consent Orders is best for you and your children, and the answer may likely change depending on your circumstances. If you need assistance deciding, or with negotiating and drafting a parenting plan or Consent Orders, experienced family lawyers like Daykin Family Law can help. Contact Daykin Family Law today for clear, practical, and supportive legal advice
Navigating the end of a relationship can be stressful and complicated, especially when dividing assets and liabilities. Many people finalise a property settlement well before finalising a divorce. At Daykin Family Law, we regularly help clients manage their financial and property settlements promptly after separation. Here’s a straightforward guide on handling property settlements before divorce in Australia.
As touched on above, yes, you can. Property settlement and divorce are separate legal matters under Australian law. You can finalise your property arrangements right after separation—even the following day in theory, although most people would likely need time to process the separation, work through any preliminary settlement steps and reach agreement. Early settlement simplifies your divorce proceedings, saving time, money, and reducing stress.
Remember, while you can start property settlement immediately, Australian law requires you to be separated for 12 months before formally applying for divorce.
Selling property before a divorce settlement is legal but requires careful planning.
Getting legal advice early ensures fair and enforceable agreements are in place before proceeding.
Australian family law as at the time of publishing this blog (noting there are changes coming to property settlement law on 10 June 2025 which this article does not cover) does not use a fixed formula to calculate property settlements. Instead, the courts consider several factors to determine a fair division:
Identify all assets, liabilities, super, financial resources, whether owned jointly or individually. Typically, these include:
Liabilities typically include mortgages, loans, and credit card debts. Independent valuations for major assets ensure accuracy.
The court currently considers both direct and indirect contributions (although keep in mind this is changing on 10 June 2025 with amendments to the Family Law Act and stay tuned to our website for more on this):
The court evaluates each person’s future needs, considering:
The court decides if the proposed settlement is just and equitable. Adjustments can be made on this step. An example may be in circumstances where one party is retaining a high portion of the combined superannuation of the parties, and the other party may for example be retaining the former matrimonial home and the mortgage. In that case, the court could make an order for the first party to split some super to the other party, and the other party to make a payment to the first party.
Formalising your property settlement legally protects both parties. Two common ways to record a settlement in a binding and enforceable way is to enter into Consent Orders or a Binding Financial Agreement (BFA).
There are specific time limits for property settlements:
Missing these deadlines requires special court permission (known as leave of the court), which may not always be granted and can be an expensive process.
Initiating your property settlement early has many advantages:
Settling your property matters early gives you clear knowledge of your financial situation. You know exactly what you own and owe, enabling better planning and decision-making about your future finances.
The earlier you settle property matters, the less likely disputes may escalate. Addressing financial issues early reduces misunderstandings, disagreements, and costly court battles, saving both parties time and money.
Finalising your settlement quickly prevents additional assets or debts from complicating your case. If either party accumulates new property or liabilities after separation, these can complicate negotiations and increase tensions.
Early settlement allows you to move on emotionally and financially. By promptly resolving financial ties, you can focus your energy on rebuilding your life and planning your future, leading to quicker emotional recovery.
Property settlements can be complex and emotionally charged. Getting expert legal guidance early is essential. Daykin Family Law specialises in managing property settlements effectively and ensuring outcomes tailored to your unique circumstances.
If you’re considering a property settlement before divorce, contact Daykin Family Law today for clear, practical, and supportive legal advice.
The duration of a property settlement varies significantly based on the complexity of your property settlement and the level of agreement between parties. Settlements can take anywhere from a few weeks to more than a year, particularly if court involvement is necessary.
Typically, each party covers their own legal fees and court costs. However, in some cases, the court might order one party to contribute to the other’s legal expenses, especially if one party has acted unreasonably during proceedings as an example.
While it’s possible to handle property settlements without legal representation, having a lawyer is highly recommended. Property settlements involve complex legal processes, and professional advice ensures your interests are protected and agreements are legally enforceable. If you’re in Brisbane and need help with property settlement, contact us today.
Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs), commonly referred to as prenuptial or postnuptial agreements, serve as an important tool for Australian couples who wish to outline the division of their assets in the event of separation or divorce. While BFAs provide clarity and security for many couples, it’s important to understand that these agreements aren’t ironclad and can indeed be overturned by the courts in certain situations. This blog delves into the grounds and processes involved in overturning a BFA, using up-to-date Australian legal references and relevant case studies as at the time of publishing.
A Binding Financial Agreement is a legally enforceable agreement under Australian law that sets out how a couple’s assets, liabilities, and financial resources will be divided if their relationship ends, and can deal with other things as well in certain cases such as maintenance and spousal maintenance. While commonly associated with marriage, BFAs can be created by de facto couples, married couples, people entering a de facto relationship, and even couples who have already separated or divorced.
There are several requirements for BFAs to avoid potential issues, and for a BFA to be binding and enforceable under Australian law, including but not limited to:
There are specific grounds outlined under Sections 90K and 90UM of the Family Law Act 1975 which outlined circumstances where a court has the power to set aside a BFA (which is essentially to overturn the BFA). Some of these include:
Fraud can involve deliberately withholding significant financial information or providing false information when drafting the agreement.
A BFA can be overturned if legal formalities are not followed. These include the absence of independent legal advice or inadequate documentation proving such advice in some circumstances.
Courts may overturn a BFA if one party was coerced into signing it, either through undue influence, emotional pressure, or outright threats. The landmark case Thorne v Kennedy [2017] exemplifies this, where the High Court invalidated a BFA after determining the wife was subjected to significant pressure and undue influence shortly before the wedding (source).
Material change in circumstances that has occurred relating to the care, welfare and development of a child and, as a result, there is certain hardship suffered.
BFAs might be overturned if circumstances have arisen since the agreement was made, it is impracticable for the agreement or part of it to be carried out.
To challenge a BFA, there is generally a detailed legal process to follow, such as:
Instead of going to court, it may sometimes be more beneficial for both parties to renegotiate the terms of the BFA amicably. This process can offer a quicker, less stressful, and more cost-effective resolution compared to formal court proceedings. It typically involves the following detailed steps:
Negotiating a new BFA is often preferable because it preserves relationships, maintains control over outcomes, and minimises legal costs and emotional strain associated with court actions.
Success in challenging a BFA varies significantly, influenced by the specific circumstances and quality of evidence. Each case is unique, and courts assess each application carefully, considering a range of factors under the relevant legislation. However, the process of overturning a BFA can be expensive and time consuming and specialist advice should be sought. Costs and consequences can flow against an unsuccessful party in court.
While Binding Financial Agreements are powerful tools offering financial security during relationship breakdowns, they aren’t ironclad and can be subject to later challenge. Understanding when and how these agreements can be contested is essential. If you find yourself questioning the fairness or legality of your BFA, seek expert legal advice promptly. Experienced family lawyers like Daykin Family Law can guide you through the complexities of your situation, ensuring your financial rights remain protected.
Parenting arrangements determine how separated parents share the care and decision-making responsibilities for their child. As family lawyers, we believe these arrangements should always prioritise the child’s best interests and safety, emphasising stability, routine, and emotional well-being.
In Australia, the Family Law Act 1975 emphasises that children have a right to a meaningful relationship with both parents, provided there are no safety risks. Parenting arrangements can be informal agreements, formalised Parenting Plans, or legally binding Consent Orders approved by the Family Law Courts. We look at a few common parenting arrangements below.
Shared care arrangements aim to allow children to maintain strong relationships with both parents. However, they generally require a high level of co-operation between parents.
Young children rely on secure attachments and consistent caregiving. Their ability to handle separation from a primary parent depends on their developmental stage.
Gradual Transitions: Sudden or extended separations from a primary caregiver can cause distress.
When determining parenting arrangements, it’s crucial to consider the child’s stage of growth and development. Younger children often benefit from frequent but shorter visits with each parent to maintain a sense of security. As children grow older, they generally have a greater capacity to handle longer periods away from each parent, allowing for extended stays or weekend visits. Tailoring the schedule to fit a child’s developmental milestones fosters a sense of stability and supports their emotional and psychological wellbeing.
In situations where conflict between parents is high, it’s important to focus on reducing children’s exposure to tension or hostility. Strategies such as neutral drop-off and pick-up locations, or scheduled handovers can help create a safer, more predictable environment for children. Minimising confrontations not only lowers stress levels for everyone involved but also ensures the child’s relationship with both parents remains as healthy as possible.
Parenting schedules should align with the reality of each family’s circumstances. Factors such as each parent’s work commitments, the distance between households, and the child’s school or extra-curricular schedule all play a role in determining a practical arrangement. Ensuring that transportation, time availability, and household logistics are manageable on a day-to-day basis helps create stability and reduces the likelihood of last-minute complications.
A predictable structure is particularly important for younger children, who thrive on routines that provide a sense of security. Consistency in meal times, bedtimes, and overall daily activities can ease the transition between two homes. Establishing shared rules and similar expectations across households can further support a cohesive upbringing and help children feel less unsettled when moving from one environment to another.
Above all, the emotional needs of the child should remain the top priority when creating parenting arrangements. Children should never feel as though they are in the middle of ongoing disputes or responsible for mediating between parents. By maintaining open communication, offering reassurance, and prioritising the child’s sense of safety, both parents can foster an environment where children feel loved and supported, regardless of changes in the family structure.
Conflict between parents can negatively impact children. Strategies to reduce conflict include:
While shared care is right for some families, it may not be appropriate in cases involving:
The Family Law Act 1975 is essentially the cornerstone of family law in Australia. Contact us today to discuss how the Act applies to your particular circumstances and what arrangements may be most suitable for your children.
The FCFCOA handles family law disputes, including parenting matters and the enforcement of Parenting Orders.
This Queensland-specific legislation aims to protect individuals, including children, from domestic violence. It can override standard parenting arrangements if there are safety concerns in certain circumstances.
The Child Protection Act 1999 provides a framework for Queensland child welfare agencies to intervene if there are concerns about a child’s safety, welfare or wellbeing.
There is no one-size-fits-all approach to parenting after separation. The above is general information only and is not intended to be relied upon or to be taken as legal advice. It is important that you get advice about your specific circumstances, and those of your family. The best arrangement is one that supports the child’s emotional security, routine, and overall wellbeing. Whether through shared care or a primary caregiving arrangement, the focus should always be on what is in the child’s best interests.
If you need legal advice on parenting arrangements, contact us today and we can guide you through the process and help create a plan that works best for your child.
After an agreement has been reached, you may sometimes run into issues with trying to understand the terms of an agreement and how it applies, especially in relation to a child’s care. After intense litigation and/or negotiations, it can be difficult at times to communicate with your former partner in a way that focusses on your child’s wellbeing and this difficulty in communicating can potentially lead to further conflict.
Tracing all the way back to the 1980s, parenting coordination has played a crucial role in helping separated parents to target this issue by improving their co-parenting relationship and assisting parents to manage any issues that come up in relation to a child’s living or care arrangements in a way that captures a child’s needs and best interests.
Parenting coordinators are generally highly specialised individuals who have a strong understanding of the family law system as well as extensive experience in working with families that have a high level of conflict or animosity. They often have a background in practising family law, family dispute resolution or preparing family reports, etc.
Parenting coordination is a process that is usually ordered by the Court or consented by both parents after a final agreement has been reached on a child’s care arrangements. The process starts off by the separated parents taking steps to officially engage the parenting coordinator to act in relation to their matter. After this takes place, an initial consultation takes place between the parenting coordinator and the parents to gain an understanding of the individual circumstances surrounding a family, assess the issues of concern held by either parent or formulate an action plan. Following this, a parenting coordinator may arrange joint sessions between parents to assist with implementing an agreement with respect to a child’s care and building a healthy environment which reduces a child’s exposure to conflict.
The process itself may take place in person or via video or telephone conference, and the parenting coordinator essentially focuses on reducing a child’s exposure to conflict by:
No. Although parenting coordination is a type of dispute resolution, the key aim of parenting coordination is to educate separated parents on how to best resolve any disputes arising from the implementation of existing agreements with respect to the child’s care. This contrasts with mediation, where the key aim is to assist both parents and/or parties to reach agreement.
Another key difference is that parenting coordination is generally a non-confidential process which means that a parenting coordinator may be called upon to prepare a report or provide evidence in Court after receiving a request from either parent and/or by the Court to do so whereas mediation takes place in a confidential setting.
Parenting coordination is also an ongoing process as opposed to mediation which generally is a one-off session or sometimes series of sessions in complex cases.
Generally, parenting coordination can range from anywhere from a couple of appointments to up to around two years. It is also not unusual for parents to touch base with parenting coordinators to resolve an issue in dispute arising from the implementation of an agreement regarding a child’s care even after a period of two years.
Parenting coordination is used in situations where an agreement has already been reached with respect to a child’s care arrangement, however, a high degree of conflict or animosity is still prevalent between the parents and cause the following:
Parenting coordination is not appropriate for situations where it is likely that the process may threaten a child’s and/or parent’s safety.
Daykin Family Law can provide expert advice on your options and the best course of action with respect to any issues that you may face whilst co-parenting with your former partner. Whilst an agreement may have been reached, engaging a family lawyer or seeking advice does not technically mean further litigation. Each scenario is unique, and we can assist you throughout this journey.
The Family Law Act 1975 governs the division of superannuation in Australia during a divorce or separation. Under this law, superannuation is treated as a type of property, and its division is managed within the same framework used for other assets, like real estate or bank accounts. This means that, in the event of a marriage or de facto relationship breakdown, superannuation can be included in the property settlement process.
The Family Law Act allows for superannuation to be divided through a “superannuation splitting order,” making it possible to transfer a portion of one spouse’s superannuation to the other as part of an equitable property settlement. Dividing superannuation fairly ensures that both parties have financial security and stability moving forward.
Splitting superannuation during a divorce can affect each party’s retirement plans. A reduction in superannuation savings may mean that both individuals need to reassess their retirement goals and financial stability in the long term. For some, dividing super may necessitate building additional retirement savings, adjusting financial plans, or considering other investment options.
One of the most common misconceptions about superannuation in divorce is that it’s automatically split 50/50 between both parties. Superannuation does not have a default equal division. Each case is assessed individually, and the outcome depends on a range of factors, rather than a simple split down the middle. The last step in the property settlement process is justice and equity. This may lead to a split other than 50/50, depending on the circumstances of each separated couple.
When determining how superannuation will be divided, the court considers various aspects. These can include the duration of the marriage, financial contributions each party made to the marriage, and any non-financial contributions, parenting and homemaking. Additional factors include the future needs such as age, health, and future earning capacity of each party, primary care of children under 18 years, as well as their relevant individual needs moving forward. The goal is to ensure that a just and equitable outcome, taking into account the entirety of their circumstances, rather than strictly following a formulaic split.
Scenario 1: Sarah and Tom were married for 25 years. Throughout their marriage, Sarah stayed home to raise their children, while Tom was the primary breadwinner and contributed significantly to his superannuation. Given Sarah’s limited superannuation balance and her reduced earning capacity due to years outside the workforce, the court may award her a share of Tom’s superannuation to balance her future financial security.
Scenario 2: Emma and Jack were married for three years, with both contributing equally to their super funds and each having an equal amount of super. They have no children, and both have similar incomes and future earning potential. In this situation, Emma and Jack may retain the entirety of their respective superannuation balances as part of settlement which may be part of achieving a just and equitable outcome.
Scenario 3: Claire and Matt were married for 10 years. Matt accumulated most of his superannuation before the marriage, while Claire’s superannuation contributions primarily occurred during the relationship. The court may consider a division that acknowledges Matt’s pre-marriage contributions and in effect focuses only on superannuation accumulated during their time together.
A superannuation splitting order is a court order that directs the division of a portion of the superannuation balance held by a superannuation fund from one spouse to the other. Either spouse can apply for this order, and it forms part of the overall property settlement process. The split goes from “super to super”, not from “super to cash” unless superannuation release requirements are met for example.
To obtain a superannuation splitting order, the value of the superannuation fund must be assessed, which often requires information from the superannuation fund itself. Once a value is determined, the court can issue an order specifying the amount or percentage of superannuation to be transferred to the other spouse’s superannuation fund. It’s worth noting again that the superannuation remains in the fund until retirement age or until eligible release, as it cannot be accessed immediately.
In some cases, couples are able to reach an agreement on how to split their superannuation without requiring lengthy court proceedings. If both parties agree on the terms of the superannuation division, they can apply for consent orders, which are legally binding agreements approved by the court.
Consent orders allow couples to avoid the formal court process, offering a more straightforward and less costly approach. To apply for consent orders, couples must submit their agreement to the court for review, along with evidence that the agreement is fair and equitable. Once approved, the consent orders become legally enforceable, and the superannuation fund is directed to split the super as agreed.
Another option to record an agreement which includes superannuation splitting is to record it in a Binding Financial Agreement. Both parties need independent legal advice and there are strict legal requirements that must be met for such agreements.
The valuation process can vary depending on the type of superannuation fund, such as accumulation funds, defined benefit schemes, or self-managed super funds. Each type of fund has different rules and methods for determining its value. For example, accumulation funds are typically valued based on their current balance, whereas defined benefit schemes may require actuarial assessments due to their complexity. Engaging the superannuation fund to obtain a valuation can help both parties understand the true worth of this asset, forming a strong foundation for equitable negotiations or court orders.
Dividing superannuation can have long-term financial impacts. Consulting with financial advisors or superannuation specialists can provide valuable insights into these implications, helping each party make informed decisions. A specialist can advise on tax consequences, potential impacts on retirement plans, and ways to adjust financial strategies post-division.
Involving a family lawyer is important when dividing superannuation, especially if complex issues or disputes arise. A family lawyer experienced in superannuation matters can guide you through the legal requirements, ensuring compliance with the The Family Law Act 1975 and protecting your interests. Lawyers play a key role in drafting and/or filing necessary documents, obtaining consent orders or drafting a Binding Financial Agreement as an example, or applying for superannuation splitting orders.
With years of experience in family law, Daykin Family Law is here to guide you through the process with clarity and compassion, ensuring you feel supported and informed every step of the way. We take the time to explain your options and work with you to find the best solution for your unique situation. If you’re looking for advice on superannuation division, reach out to our team today.
We are often asked about the process of child custody mediation by our clients. With years of experience as family lawyers, we understand that going through a divorce is tough – for you, your ex-partner, the children, and the wider family. When emotions are high and the future is uncertain, there can be a significant amount of conflict that arises in the decision-making process, leading one or both partners to find themselves unable to compromise or reach a decision in the best interests of the children.
In Australia, as discussed in our recent child custody blog, the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) emphasises that first and foremost, couples should not use the Courts where possible and instead engage in child custody mediation before escalating to the Court. Even where a parenting order application is made through the Court, the applicant will most likely be obliged to demonstrate that they have attempted to resolve their differences before having the Court intervene.
Custody is no longer a term used by the Family Law Courts, opting instead for terms associated with what time a child spends with each parent and what communications they will have. If it is safe, both parents are encouraged to play an active role in their children’s lives for the benefit of their wellbeing. However, it can be difficult to come to an agreed decision on issues such as health, living arrangements, finances, and education.
When parents can’t agree during child custody discussions, that’s where a mediator comes in. A family lawyer can organise for an experienced Family Dispute Resolution Practitioner to facilitate discussions between both parties in an impartial, calm manner. The goal of mediation in custody cases is to come to an agreement approved by both sides that can be turned into either a Parenting Plan or approved by the Courts in a formal Consent Order if required.
Mediators are not there to make judgments or take sides. They are engaged to essentially chair a meeting between both parties and facilitate proactive discussion in a safe, controlled environment that allows a resolution to be reached that is in their children’s best interests.
There are several options for child custody mediation. The most cost-effective is the use of the Family Relationship Centres, Family Relationships Australia, or other public and community-based services. These services can assist parents in discussing the issues and potentially writing up a new Parenting Plan. Legal representatives are not permitted in this process, however.
Private child mediation services also exist, usually at a higher cost. Your family lawyer can attend and represent you throughout the mediation. This can be helpful to receive advice on the spot regarding the law relating to your particular matter, your rights, and the impact of any proposals. A solicitor can then draft the agreement terms on the day if it is appropriate, usually to be formalised soon after.
Going to court is usually avoided and when undertaken is usually expensive. Friendly mediation allows you to come to an acceptable resolution swiftly and cost-effectively.
Sometimes, mediation isn’t an appropriate course of action, particularly in circumstances involving family violence. In such cases, the support of a lawyer can assist in effectively dealing with challenging cases to ensure your interests are protected. If there are allegations of abuse, your lawyer can advise whether the case should proceed in Court instead of with a mediator.
The most effective mediation happens when both parties have sought legal advice about their circumstance beforehand. You are much more likely to be prepared, to understand the probable outcomes, your options, and how a Court might deal with your matter. By figuring this out in advance, and understanding your legal position, both parties are more likely to be more informed and will have considered in advance of negotiations what they are or aren’t willing to compromise on.
Your lawyer can come to mediation sessions and advise you as the session progresses. Sometimes mediation can become heated or tense when sensitive and important issues are addressed and having your lawyer with you ensures you have your say and your interests and those of your children are prioritised throughout.
Preparation is key to effective mediation. With the support of your lawyer, you can approach mediation with more of an open mind, ready to listen and to develop a mutually satisfactory agreement. Remember to keep your children and their best interests in mind and be aware of the impact of conflict on them. Importantly, it’s best to approach mediation as a place to solve parenting problems rather than bring up any other marital issues.
Mediation in custody cases isn’t always smooth sailing, but by remembering that you are there to find a solution for your children and listening to the advice of your lawyer and the guidance of the mediator, you are much more likely to reach a settlement that works for both of you.
The most common topics that are discussed and resolved in child custody mediation are things like living arrangements or relocation, child support, health issues, education, religion, how time will be split between parents and how school holidays will be spent, overseas travel, and the division of payments for things like after-school activities.
When a mediator is appointed, each parent is normally invited to a pre-mediation meeting separately to establish whether the case is suitable for child custody mediation. If you have appointed a lawyer, they will advise you whether this is the case and what available options there are.
Both parties can then be asked to prepare a short statement to bring to the initial session, outlining what they hope to achieve from mediation.
Each mediation session can run for a shorter period, such as around three hours, or even a full day. In some cases, it can take several sessions to resolve some of the more significant issues. This is expedited if both parties come prepared and willing to compromise.
If no agreement can be reached in mediation, then a certificate will be issued by the mediator. Either parent can then file for parenting proceedings in the Court. Such a certificate will also be issued if a genuine effort isn’t made by one parent to resolve the dispute, if a parent fails to attend, or for another relevant reason.
Where possible, it would be prudent to speak to a family lawyer who can help you understand your options before appointing a mediator. Daykin Family Law is expertly skilled in children’s and parenting matters including child custody mediation, and works closely with psychologists, social workers, and mediators to help you and your family stay out of Court wherever possible. We can recommend a suitable mediator for your matter and assist in inviting the other parent to mediation.
At Daykin Family Law, we place a high importance on assisting clients to reduce conflict and maintain respect in the co-parenting relationship after separation as much as possible. Shannon Daykin is an experienced Family and Divorce Lawyer. An Accredited Family Law Specialist, Shannon was recently named a Leading Family & Divorce Lawyer (Recommended, Brisbane) and a Leading Parenting & Children’s Matters Lawyer (Recommended, Queensland) in the prestigious Doyle’s Guide 2018 and 2019. In 2019, Daykin Family Law was named in the Doyle’s Guide as a Leading Family & Divorce Law Firm (Recommended).
We give you expert legal advice on the most appropriate and cost-effective course of action for you and your family. Contact us at (07) 3338 5645 to make an appointment for a fixed fee initial consultation today.
Co-parenting can refer to the shared responsibility of raising a child by both parents, even after separation or divorce. In the context of family law, co-parenting ensures that both parents continue to play an active role in their child’s life, despite the breakdown of their relationship. It prioritises the child’s best interests, ensuring that they receive care, guidance, and support from both parents.
Two parents, Sarah and Mark, who have recently separated but share care of their 8-year-old son, Liam. They both agree on a parenting plan that allows Liam to spend weekdays with Sarah, as she lives closer to his school, and weekends with Mark. Both parents treat each other with respect and courtesy.
To ensure consistency, Sarah and Mark communicate regularly about Liam’s schoolwork, discipline issues, extra-curricular activities, and any health concerns. Even though they live in separate homes, they make decisions together about Liam’s education and healthcare as some examples, ensuring he has a stable and supportive environment. Both parents attend Liam’s school events and share the responsibility of transportation, without involving him in any disagreements they might have.
This approach allows Liam to benefit from the care and involvement of both parents while maintaining a sense of routine and security.
In Australia, co-parenting comes with significant legal responsibilities. Under the Family Law Act 1975, if a parenting order is in place providing for joint decision-making about major long-term issues, then both parents must make certain important decisions about their child’s upbringing together. These decisions can include matters like education, healthcare, and religious upbringing. However, joint decision-making about major long-term issues does not necessarily mean equal time spent with the child, as this is determined by what is in the best interests of the child.
It can be useful for parents to formalise parenting arrangements, either through a Parenting Plan or applying for a Parenting Order, to avoid misunderstandings and ensure that everyone involved knows their responsibilities.
For families facing disputes or complex situations, seeking legal advice can be helpful. Daykin Family Law offers expert guidance to help parents reach fair, legally sound parenting arrangements that take into account the best interest of the child. With a focus on minimising conflict and prioritising the child’s well-being, Daykin Family Law ensures that families can navigate co-parenting with clarity and support.
Financial responsibility is a crucial aspect of co-parenting, and both parents are expected to contribute to the costs of raising their child, even after separation. Child support is designed to help cover essential expenses such as schooling, healthcare, and daily living costs. The amount each parent contributes typically depends on factors such as income, the number of children, and the time spent with each parent.
It’s important to ensure that child support arrangements are appropriate and meet the child’s needs. For more details on how child support is calculated and what obligations co-parents may have, you can read our blog on How Much is Child Support in Australia?. Understanding these financial responsibilities helps create a stable environment for the child, ensuring their well-being is always prioritised.
Parents can also enter into private agreements regarding child support. Read more about this option.
Clear, respectful, and regular communication is key to ensuring both parents stay informed about their child’s needs and activities. Use email, messaging apps, or scheduled calls to keep conversations focused and constructive.
Several apps are designed to help manage co-parenting logistics, such as shared calendars, expense tracking, and communication. Apps like OurFamilyWizard and 2Houses can assist in organising schedules and keeping everything documented for smooth communication and understanding.
Consistency is important for children, especially after a separation. Creating a structured routine for your child that is upheld in both households can lead to co-parenting success. This includes meal times, bedtimes, and school activities. Consistency reduces stress for the child and helps them adjust to the new family dynamics.
While co-parenting requires communication, it’s essential to set clear boundaries about each other’s personal lives. Respecting these boundaries ensures a more harmonious co-parenting relationship, allowing both parents to focus on their child’s needs.
Disagreements are bound to happen, but when they become difficult to resolve, consider seeking mediation. Family mediation provides a neutral space where parents can address conflicts and come to mutually beneficial agreements.
For more insight on how to go about successful co parenting see our article on Co-Parenting Essentials: Effective Strategies That Work.
While co-parenting can often be managed amicably, there are certain situations where seeking legal advice is necessary to ensure the best outcome for both parents and children.
If parents are unable to agree on where the child will live, how much time they will spend with each parent, or other key issues, legal advice can help resolve disputes. A family lawyer can guide you through dispute resolution processes such as mediation, or assist in drafting a Parenting Plan or applying for a Parenting Order.
If there are concerns about your child’s safety due to family violence, neglect, or abuse, it’s crucial to urgently seek legal help immediately. Family lawyers can assist in applying for court orders to ensure the child’s protection, including urgent applications if needed.
If there has been a significant change in circumstances – such as relocation, changes in employment, or health concerns, that affects existing parenting arrangements, seeking legal advice can help you navigate the necessary adjustments or amendments that may need to be proposed or applied for in relation to court orders.
If the other parent is not following the agreed Parenting Plan or court-ordered arrangements, legal action can be necessary. A lawyer can help with enforcement of the existing orders, negotiate new terms, or take necessary legal action to ensure compliance in some circumstances.
If one parent wishes to relocate or take the child overseas, and the other parent does not agree, legal advice should be sought. This ensures that any moves comply with family law.
Seeking legal advice ensures that your parental rights are protected and that the arrangements you make are in the best interests of your child. At Daykin Family Law, our experienced family lawyers are here to provide guidance and support throughout the co-parenting process, helping you reach legally sound solutions that work for everyone involved. Get in touch with ShannonDaykin and her team today!
In this article, we look at how long divorce takes in Australia.
Divorce can be a complicated process to navigate as it requires extensive legal procedures and paperwork. While the standard divorce process in Australia usually takes a few months to be finalised after submitting an application, the total duration of divorce proceedings and everything that they entail can vary significantly as many factors come into play.
Let’s take a closer look at the factors that influence how long a divorce takes.
The legal framework in Australia provides certain guidelines and timelines for divorce, but individual cases can vary widely in their duration. The average divorce takes around 3-4 years from separation to a finalised settlement.
It’s also important to note the distinction above between the divorce itself, which is simply the legal severance of the marriage, and everything else that it entails such as devising property settlement, calculating child support, determining spousal maintenance etc. While the actual time between filing for divorce and having a divorce order issued by the court usually only takes several months, the rest of the proceedings may take much longer.
Divorce is usually granted in two steps:
Step 1: Court order
If all the requirements are met and the court is convinced that adequate provisions have been set for any children involved in the relationship, a court order will be issued. However, it’s crucial to recognise that a period of time must usually pass before the order takes effect.
Step 2: Finalising the Divorce
Following the issuing of the initial court order, there is a standard waiting period. The divorce order generally becomes absolute 1 month and 1 day after the order is made, marking this date as the official divorce date. However, there are circumstances where the court might have compelling reasons to delay the granting of the divorce beyond this timeframe.
Now let’s look at the full timeline and process of separation, divorce proceedings, and all other relevant factors to get a more comprehensive picture of the duration between the initial separation, the finalised divorce, and property settlement.
While each situation may have unique circumstances, there are general procedures in place that influence how long divorce takes in Australia to ensure fairness and due diligence.
While the procedure might seem straightforward and sequential, each step can carry emotional, logistical, and legal significance. And though the timelines may vary depending on individual circumstances, understanding the general outline ensures you’re better prepared for the journey.
Beyond the emotional turbulence of a divorce, the practical implications concerning assets, property, and finances are often significant. Property settlement is an essential aspect of many divorces, ensuring that both parties can move forward with clarity and security regarding their financial futures.
A divorce property settlement refers to the process through which assets, debts, and finances are divided between both parties after separation. This isn’t just about tangible assets like a home or bank accounts; it can also encompass superannuation, investments, and other financial interests.
Find out more about property settlement after divorce.
Much like the divorce process itself, the duration of property settlement can be influenced by several factors:
It’s worth noting that while the divorce might be finalised, property settlement can take place either before or after the divorce order has been made. However, it’s crucial to be aware that once a divorce order takes effect, a 12 month time limit commences for parties to file in the Court for property settlement and/or spousal maintenance, or leave may need to be sought to file out of time. For separated de facto couples, this time limit is 2 years from the date of separation. Such leave applications can be expensive and success is not guaranteed. Find out more about how assets are divided in a divorce.
For more information on how long divorce takes in Australia, reach out to Daykin Family Law today.
Whether you are separating from your de facto partner or spouse, there are often many decisions to make, from the division of finances and property settlement to arrangements for child support and divorce. Our divorce lawyers are here to help you every step of the way. Shannon Daykin is an Accredited Family Law Specialist with extensive experience in all aspects of family law. Contact Daykin Family Law today to arrange a reduced fixed fee initial consultation.